- Misty wrote:
- Oh well, i lilke Misty
well my user name actually stands for a forum i used to have before stupid onlineguardian shut me down for saying non nude adult models are considered porn in there eyes. yea 90% of all the models posted there were sports illustrated models.( go figure.) oh here's what gets me. they said it was not the fact that they were clothed and adults models. it was the fact that some of the posses that were posted were sexually suggestive and there for considered pornography in there eyes.. hahaha .there models. like due. all there pictures are sexual in one way shape or form to someone.. and who are they to say and state..
(IN THERE EYES IT'S PORNOGRAPHY)what one person may see as one thing another may not. all i seen was hot S.I. models in bikinis.. nothing more. if it was i would not have allowed it. i know what porn is.i mean who are they and what gives them the wright.. (religis freaks). that's what they are. they are against anything that dose not go by there believes. the last i remember. doesn't S.I. and Vitoria secret both do a TV special once a year on public TV.
i mean i could see if i had nudes or xxx. but bikinis lingerie.. PLEASE!!!!
so now i have a new private forum that is not in any forum directory and all religis antis can get to stepping
OK I'm sorry guy's. Lil off topic. but as you can see i still get upset about being shut down for such a stupid reason.i had that place for two years.put alot of work in there.had over 10.000 members and never had a problem. until those morons shown up.. oh well stuff happens i guess.
so getting back on topic here
so me gdlp. but frank always had a nice ring to it. like if i may be frank about it.